For example what if for one of the 'My Second SQL Book' checkouts the title is think of an ERD as any diagram which models relationships between entities. In this example, all performers must be Three relations are required to represent The entity relationship diagram above The second possibility for this kind of. The first principle is enforced with an entity relationship (ER) diagram, while the second with normalization. This lecture A relationship set is a set R of relationships (e1, , en), where each ei comes from the same entity set Ei, for 1 ≤ i ≤ n. Example: The following shows a relationship set R between entity sets A and B. a1.
A one-to-one relationship between two entities exists when a particular entity instance exists in one table, and it can have only one associated entity instance in another table.
Table of Contents
A user can have only one address, and an address belongs to only one user. In the database world, this sort of relationship is implemented like this: Let's go ahead and add some data to our table. Referential Integrity We're going to take a slight detour here to discuss a topic that's extremely important when dealing with table relationships: This is a concept used when discussing relational data which states that table relationships must always be consistent. Different RDBMSes might enforce referential integrity rules differently, but the concept is the same.
The constraints we've defined for our addresses table enforce the one to one relationship we want between it and our users table, whereby a user can only have one address and an address must have one, and only one, user. This is an example of referential integrity.Introduction to ER model
Let's demonstrate how this works. What happens if we try to add another address for a user who already has one? How about if we try to add an address for a user who doesn't exist? Here we get a different error. If you're wondering why we can add a user without an address but can't add an address without a user, this is down to the modality of the relationship between the two entities. Don't worry about exactly what this means for now, just think of it as another aspect of entity relationships.
Adding this clause, and setting it to CASCADE basically means that if the row being referenced is deleted, the row referencing it is also deleted. Determining what to do in situations where you delete a row that is referenced by another row is an important design decision, and is part of the concept of maintaining referential integrity.
One-to-Many Okay, time to get back to our different table relationship types with a look at one-to-many. A one-to-many relationship exists between two entities if an entity instance in one of the tables can be associated with multiple records entity instances in the other table. The opposite relationship does not exist; that is, each entity instance in the second table can only be associated with one entity instance in the first table.
A book has many reviews. A review belongs to only one book. Let's set up the necessary data. There's a key difference worth pointing out in the statement for our reviews table however: In other words a book can have many reviews. Now we have created our books and reviews tables, let's add some data to them. A program is made up of one or more courses. A student must enroll in a program. A student takes the courses that are part of her program. A program has a name, a program identifier, the total credit points required to graduate, and the year it commenced.
A course has a name, a course identifier, a credit point value, and the year it commenced. Students have one or more given names, a surname, a student identifier, a date of birth, and the year they first enrolled. When he finishes the course, a grade such as A or B and a mark such as 60 percent are recorded.
Each course in a program is sequenced into a year for example, year 1 and a semester for example, semester 1. Although it is compact, the diagram uses some advanced features, including relationships that have attributes and two many-to-many relationships.
The ER diagram of the university database In our design: Each student must be enrolled in a program, so the Student entity participates totally in the many-to-one EnrollsIn relationship with Program.
A program can exist without having any enrolled students, so it participates partially in this relationship. As a weak entity, Course participates totally in the many-to-one identifying relationship with its owning Program. This relationship has Year and Semester attributes that identify its sequence position. Student and Course are related through the many-to-many Attempts relationships; a course can exist without a student, and a student can be enrolled without attempting any courses, so the participation is not total.
When a student attempts a course, there are attributes to capture the Year and Semester, and the Mark and Grade. For a real university, many more aspects would need to be captured by the database. The airline has one or more airplanes.
An airplane has a model number, a unique registration number, and the capacity to take one or more passengers. An airplane flight has a unique flight number, a departure airport, a destination airport, a departure date and time, and an arrival date and time. Each flight is carried out by a single airplane.
Learning MySQL by Hugh E. Williams, Saied M.M. Tahaghoghi
A passenger has given names, a surname, and a unique email address. A passenger can book a seat on a flight. The ER diagram of the flight database An Airplane is uniquely identified by its RegistrationNumber, so we use this as the primary key. A Flight is uniquely identified by its FlightNumber, so we use the flight number as the primary key.
Creating multiple tables and table relationships
The departure and destination airports are captured in the From and To attributes, and we have separate attributes for the departure and arrival date and time. Because no two passengers will share an email address, we can use the EmailAddress as the primary key for the Passenger entity. An airplane can be involved in any number of flights, while each flight uses exactly one airplane, so the Flies relationship between the Airplane and Flight relationships has cardinality 1: N; because a flight cannot exist without an airplane, the Flight entity participates totally in this relationship.
A passenger can book any number of flights, while a flight can be booked by any number of passengers. N Books relationship between the Passenger and Flight relationship, but considering the issue more carefully shows that there is a hidden entity here: We capture this by creating the intermediate entity Booking and 1: N relationships between it and the Passenger and Flight entities.
Identifying such entities allows us to get a better picture of the requirements.
Entity Relationship Modeling Examples - Learning MySQL [Book]
There are no requirements to capture passenger details such as age, gender, or frequent-flier number. If, instead, we assumed that the capacity is determined by the model number, we would have created a new AirplaneModel entity with the attributes ModelNumber and Capacity.
The Airplane entity would then not have a Capacity attribute.
Airlines typically use a flight number to identify a given flight path and schedule, and they specify the date of the flight independently of the flight number.
For example, there is one IR flight on April 1, another on April 2, and so on.